|
|

|
A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo
Reconstruction Algorithms
Steve Seitz and Brian Curless, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA
James Diebel, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
Daniel Scharstein, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT
Richard Szeliski, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA |
Please see the research page for details on
other projects.Abstract— This paper presents a quantitative
comparison of several multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. Until
now, the lack of suitable calibrated multi-view image datasets with
known ground truth (3D shape models) has prevented such direct
comparisons. In this paper, we first survey multi-view stereo
algorithms and compare them qualitatively using a taxonomy that
differentiates their key properties. We then describe our process
for acquiring and calibrating multiview image datasets with
high-accuracy ground truth and introduce our evaluation methodology.
Finally, we present the results of our quantitative comparison of
state-of-the-art multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms on six
benchmark datasets. The datasets, evaluation details, and
instructions for submitting new models are available online at
Multi-View Stereo
Evaluation Homepage (http://vision.middlebury.edu/mview).
This paper was presented at the
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR06).
|